Sorry, I was specifically looking at the T3 cores vs the Metalcloak Duroflex CAs. With the "Joint Alignment" this is what I was referring to..
https://imgur.com/a/BMMcFu0
Referenced from:
https://metalcloak.com/jeep-jk-wran...d-plates/jk-wrangler-suspension/jk-wrangler-duroflex-control-arms-full-set.html
The Metalcloak Duroflex joint is a steel sleeve that is suspended in a rubber bushing. If they didn’t align the joint as they do it would preload the rubber joint and cause premature wear. Sort of like tightening a stock rubber bushing with the suspension at full droop then setting it down. It would twist up the rubber and preload the joint causing premature failure. So they align the joint to the control arm bracket. The Metalcloak arms work very well and flex as good as any on the market. I have installed many sets with the Gamechanger lifts and they work well.
I have been running the Tier 3 Core 4X4 arms for 2 years or more. I purchased them from
@AOR here. They have been awesome. There is no way you will break these. They are excellent quality and I easily use all the flex that my Falcon 3.3s provide. I would buy them again in a second. I’ve put 30,000 miles on them and they are still tight. I keep them greased with silicone Super Lube.
As far as joint alignment it is not necessary for them to align the joints like the Duroflex joints do. The Currie Johnny Joint is basically a ball of medal that is supported by two poly bushings. It isn’t attached so it rotates freely not requiring a specific alignment. The poly joint end is aligned to the control arm bracket so no issues there.
Between the 2 control arms I think that the Core are more durable and likely to take a hammering. If you held the 2 brands in your hand you would understand. The Metalcloak absorb a little more impact like a factory control arm bushing does which provides a quieter on road ride. A little less feel to impacts. I love my Core arms but you can’t go wrong with either arm.